Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audrey Coulter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:39, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Audrey Coulter

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 05:24, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Joeykai (talk) 05:24, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep. The lead is misleading as she appears to have 'not' been a part of the Rio Olympics, actually... but there is still extensive coverage about her competition results, along with an entire CNN segment about her. (CNN: [1]) The sources in the article are generally sufficient and pass WP:RS, but I can pull out more if needed on request. Nomader (talk) 06:12, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Nomader What would you say were the WP:THREE best sources covering Coulter? Alvaldi (talk) 09:38, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Alvaldi: I wrote out a detailed thing for all three and I somehow didn't save it and lost the draft. Very frustrating. I also changed to Weak Keep which feels more accurate for where I'm at with this one. A more simplified version is below (also I changed to Weak Keep after diving for more sources -- I think that this article will never go past being a stub and she is barely notable enough to satisfy WP:GNG and the recommended requirements listed at WP:NEQUESTRIAN per her wins at the Adequan Grand Prix and the Longines FEI World Cup Jumping Sacramento competition in 2016):
The CNN segment that I linked to above.

The Palm Beach Post article about her win in the Adequan Grand Prix, an FEI World Cup competition.

A feature in Riding Magazine about her (although, I haven't been able to find any editorial explanation and I question its legitimacy, and if it doesn't qualify, I would say this article at The Gaitpost which does appear to have an actual editorial team and experts on horse riding writing the articles).
Nomader (talk) 15:21, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Participating in the Rio olympics does not satisfy WP:SPORTSPERSON which states "sportsperson is presumed to be notable if the person has won a significant honor" (emphasis added). Daughter of notable person isn't reason enough as per WP:INVALIDBIO MetricMaster (talk) 08:09, 23 March 2023 (UTC)This user has made 47 edits to Wikipedia. Their contribution history shows that 38 of these were to AFD discussions. The account exists for votestacking and has been blocked.[reply]
@MetricMaster: Agree with you on the point about participating in the Olympics, but it's worth further noting that she didn't actually make the team and the article is incorrect here. Nomader (talk) 15:22, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:46, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. I should note that the Delete vote comes from a sock.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:31, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I think the sources listed by Nomader are just about adequate for GNG. Sojourner in the earth (talk) 11:26, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 05:26, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The sources provided by Nomader demonstrate the subject passes WP:SIGCOV and WP:SPORTSBIO.4meter4 (talk) 14:27, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.